STATE v. SMITH

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Antoine Smith, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of assault in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, and two counts of armed criminal action. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred by not telling the jury to disregard a comment by the prosecutor during closing argument.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment. Rule 30.25(b).