Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PRINCE v. N.Y. CITY DEPT

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Oct 2, 2008
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Termination of petitioner's subsidy for violation of the regulations governing the voucher assistance program for low-income housing, under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 as amended ( 42 USC ยง 1437f), was supported by substantial evidence. The penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness ( see Matter of Gerena v Donovan, 51 AD3d 502).