ROSS v. FONDREN

MICHAEL DAVIS, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated July 31, 2008. [Docket No. 15]. Petitioner Nicholas John Ross filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. [Docket No. 16]. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, with the exception that, on the second line of the third paragraph of page six, "U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c)" is changed to read "U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b)."

Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 31, 2008 [Docket No. 15], with the exception that, on the second line of the third paragraph of page six, "U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c)" is changed to read "U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b)."

2. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Docket No. 1] is DISMISSED.