- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. CAUFIELD
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Dec 16, 2008
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying, without an evidentiary hearing, the defendant's motion to withdraw his pleas of guilty. The defendant's conclusory allegations that he was coerced to enter the plea agreements were directly belied by the record of the plea proceedings ( see People v Owens, 43 AD3d 1185; People v Morales, 17 AD3d 487; People v Rangolan, 295 AD2d 543; People v Fernandez, 291 AD2d 456).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.