- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
SAUCIER v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE NORTH A. TIRE
DAVID BRAMLETTE III, District Judge
Motions for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Ford Motor Company (Ford) and Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (Mazda) ( Docs. 50, 57) on the Plaintiffs' breach of warranty claim (First Claim) and Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act claim (Second Claim) are before the Court. The motions raise the statute of limitations as a defense. The Plaintiffs have notified the Court that they do not oppose the motions.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. Ford's and Mazda's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ( Doc. 50) on the Plaintiffs' breach of warranty claim (First Claim) and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ( Doc. 57) on the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act claim (Second Claim) are granted.
2. Ford and Mazda are granted partial summary judgment on the Plaintiffs' breach of warranty claim (First Claim) and Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act claim (Second Claim) because the claims are barred by the statute of limitations.
3. The Plaintiffs' other claims remain pending.
SO ORDERED.
Alert