Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

HEATHERLY v. STATE

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 1, 2009
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

No. 317A06-2.

Attorney(S)

North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law, by Jeanette Doran Brooks and Robert F. Orr, for plaintiff-appellants; and North Carolina Justice Center, by Jack Holtzman, for plaintiff-intervenor-appellants Willis Williams and the North Carolina Common Sense Foundation. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Norma S. Harrell and Ronald M. Marquette, Special Deputy Attorneys General, for defendant-appellees. Williams Mullen, by Charles B. Neely, Jr., for the Tax Foundation, amicus curiae.

JUDGES

PER CURIAM.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM.

Justice MARTIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, the remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk, 360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006).

AFFIRMED.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x