Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

WALTON HOUSTON v. BRICKER + CANNADY, 01-09-00166-CV (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 6-18-2009)

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston.
Jun 18, 2009
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Walton Houston Galleria Office, LLP has neither established indigence, nor paid all the required fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. ยงยง 51.207 (Vernon 2005), 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2008); 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2008) (listing fees in court of appeals); FEES CIV. CASES B(1), (3) (listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant Walton Houston Galleria Office, LLP did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We deny all pending motions.