- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
SPRINKLE v. BARKSDALE
GLEN CONRAD, District Judge
In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED
as follows:
1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED;
2. Defendant DiGiovanni's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 45) is GRANTED;
3. The motion to dismiss filed by the other medical defendants (Dkt. No. 53) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the motion is GRANTED as to Defendants Elko, Driskoll, and Sams, but is DENIED as to Defendants Cypress and Downs with regard to plaintiff's claims, as outlined in the memorandum opinion, that these defendants acted with deliberate indifferent to his serious medical need for pain medication. These defendants are directed to file an answer and any other dispositive motion within twenty (20) days from entry of this order; and
4. The clerk shall terminate the following defendants from the action: Mosley, Stephens, Schilling, Ratcliff-Walker, Booker, Mason, Harper, Dent, Smith, Elko, Driskoll, Sams, and Degiovanni;14
Alert