- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
U.S. v. ALOE
THOMAS THALKEN, Magistrate Judge
This matter is before the court on the motion for an extension of time by defendant Mark Aloe (Aloe) (Filing No. 20). Aloe seeks until November 8, 2009, in which to file pretrial motions in accordance with the progression order. Aloe's counsel represents that Aloe will file an affidavit wherein he consents to the motion and acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Aloe's counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection to the motion. Upon consideration motion will be granted.
IT IS ORDERED:
Defendant Aloe's motion for an extension of time (Filing No. 20) is granted. Aloe is given until on or before November 9, 2009, in which to file pretrial motions pursuant to the progression order. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between August 3, 2009 and November 9, 2009, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. ยง 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).
Alert