- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
MERANDO v. VANTASSEL
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 13, 2009
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
Since the child is now over 18 years of age, she is no longer subject to the order appealed from ( see Matter of DelVecchio v DelVecchio, 64 AD3d 594; Matter of McGovern v Lynch, 62 AD3d 712; Matter of Luis A.S., 33 AD3d 793, 794). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as academic ( see Matter of Cruz v Cruz, 48 AD3d 804, 805; Matter of Zaim R., 43 AD3d 824; Matter of Sassower-Berlin v Berlin, 31 AD3d 771). The matter does not qualify as an exception to the mootness doctrine ( see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715; Matter of Ronald N., 14 AD3d 567).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.