ROSARIO v. BNS BUILDINGS

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances, where, inter alia, the plaintiff established that the proposed medical testing was potentially dangerous ( cf. Lefkowitz v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 94 AD2d 18, 21), the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendants' motion which was to compel her to submit to the proposed testing ( see Santero v Kotwal, 4 AD3d 464, 465; Bobka v Mann, 308 AD2d 497, 498; Marino v Pena, 211 AD2d 668, 668-669).