Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PIETSCH v. McKISSACK McKISSACK

United States District Court, D. Columbia.
Jan 12, 2010
MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICARDO URBINA, District Judge

GRANTING THE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; DENYING AS MOOT THE PLAINTIFF'S FIRST MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS For the reasons stated in the court's Memorandum Opinion separately and contemporaneously issued this 12th day of January, 2010, it is hereby

ORDERED that the plaintiff's second motion to amend the complaint is GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's first motion to amend the complaint is DENIED as moot; and it is

ORDERED that the defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.