- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PIETSCH v. McKISSACK McKISSACK
United States District Court, D. Columbia.
Jan 12, 2010
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO URBINA, District Judge
GRANTING THE PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; DENYING AS MOOT THE PLAINTIFF'S FIRST MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS For the reasons stated in the court's Memorandum Opinion separately and contemporaneously issued this 12th day of January, 2010, it is hereby
ORDERED that the plaintiff's second motion to amend the complaint is GRANTED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's first motion to amend the complaint is DENIED as moot; and it is
ORDERED that the defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.