WHITE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION

AND NOW, this 5th day of August, 2010, upon consideration of the plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Docket No. 10); the defendant's opposition, the plaintiff's reply, and the defendant's sur-reply thereto; the plaintiff's supplemental authority to its motion and the defendant's response thereto; and the defendant's supplemental authority in opposition to the plaintiff's motion; and for the reasons set forth in a Memorandum of today's date; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion to remand is DENIED.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file a response to the defendant's Motion for Change of Venue (Docket No. 4) on or before August 19, 2010. The defendant shall then have one week to file a brief in reply.