Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

SEAN S. v. CAESAR

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Dec 7, 2010
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

No. 2009-10905, (Docket No. N-22850-09).

Attorney(S)

Edward E. Caesar, Brooklyn, N.Y., nonparty-appellant pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Stephen McGrath and Elina Drucker of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. Emmanuel F. Ntiamoah, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent-respondent Benito S. Jessica Marcus, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent-respondent Tracy B.

JUDGES

Reinaldo E. Rivera

Thomas A. Dickerson

Plummer E. Lott

Sheri S. Roman

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The attorney for the child failed to demonstrate that the psychologist's services were "necessary" (County Law § 722-c; see Matter of Garfield M., 128 AD2d 876). Accordingly, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the application pursuant to County Law § 722-c to have the psychologist examine the child.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x