- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. SUDHAN
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Apr 12, 2011
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the accomplice's testimony was sufficiently corroborated ( see CPL 60.22; People v Reome, 15 NY3d 188, 194; People v Cortez, 81 AD3d 742).
The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erred in its jury instruction for the conspiracy count is not preserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.