Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

IN RE BEVERLY RILEY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
May 3, 2011
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

We find the penalty so disproportionate as to be shocking to our sense of fairness ( see Lackow v Department of Educ. [or "Board"] of City of N.Y., 51 AD3d 563, 569). The student admitted that she sustained no physical or emotional injury as a result of the incident, and in the 15 years preceding the incident, petitioner had received not a single formal reproach ( compare Matter of Weinstein v Department of Educ. of City of N.Y., 19 AD3d 165, lv denied 6 NY3d 706, Matter of Solis v Department of Educ. of City of N.Y., 30 AD3d 532, and Gabriel v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2009 NY Slip Op 32249[U], with Matter of Ebner v Board of Educ. of E. Williston Union Free School Dist. No. 2, N Hempstead, 42 NY2d 938).

[Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 32540(U).]