PEOPLE v. TOPPIN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Feb 14, 2006

Judgment

CaseIQ

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The fact that the defendant's statements were not electronically recorded was not a ground to suppress those statements ( see People v. Caballero, 23 AD3d 1031; People v. Boyd, 21 AD3d 1428, 1429; People v. Oglesby, 15 AD3d 888, 889; People v. Martin, 294 AD2d 850; People v. Falkenstein, 288 AD2d 922, 923; People v. Ferguson, 285 AD2d 901, 902; People v. Grimes, 191 AD2d 745).