Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MUHAMMED DANISH C. K. (MINOR) v. THE STATE OF KERALA

Kerala High Court
May 18, 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 28TH VAISAKHA, 1944

WP(C) NO. 40241 OF 2018

PETITIONER/S:

1 MUHAMMED DANISH C. K. (MINOR)

S/O.MUHAMMED ASHRAF C.K., REPRESENTED BY MUHAMMED ASHRAF C.K., S/O. IBRAYI, CHERANKANDI, KARAKKAMALA P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT-670645.

2 ASHWIN RAJ T.R.,(MINOR),

S/O.RAJESH KUMAR T.B., REPRESENTED BY RAJESH KUMAR T.B., S/O.BALAN, SREESHA NIVAS, CLUB KUNNU, MANATHAVADY P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT-

670645.

3 ATHISH SHAIJO (MINOR),

S/O.SHAIJO JACOB, REPRESENTED BY SHAIJO JACOB, S/O.JACOB, PLATHOTTATHIL, PALAVAYAL P.O., VIA, CHERUPUZHA, KASARAGODE DISTRICT-670511.

4 RAHUL RAJ G.,(MINOR),

S/O.GOPALAKRISHNAN P.V., REPRESENTED BY GOPALAKRISHNAN, S/O.CHANDU, VATTAPARA HOUSE, MUNNAD P.O., VIA, CHENGALA, KASARAGODE DISTRICT-

670541.

BY ADV SUNIL V.MOHAMMED

RESPONDENT/S:

1 THE STATE OF KERALA

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY FOR SPORTS AND

YOUTH AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695001.

2 THE KERALA STATE SPORTS COUNCIL,

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, STATUE JUNCTION,

PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

3 THE KERALA STATE VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION,

NOORMAHAL, PERUMTHALMANNA P.O., MALAPURAM

DISTRICT-679322.

1

-2-

4 THE VOLLEYBALL FEDERATION OF INDIA,

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY GENERAL, ROOM

NO.72, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, CHENNAI-

600003.

BY ADVS.

ROSHEN D. ALEXANDER D

VISHNUDAS HARIDAS

TINA ALEX THOMAS(K/000532/2004) HARIMOHAN(K/000327/2018)

OTHER PRESENT:

SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GP

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR

ADMISSION ON 18.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY

DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

-3-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

====================================================== W.P.(C) No.40241 of 2018

============================================================= Dated this the 18th day of May, 2022

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the prayers in this writ petition have become infructuous. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

JUDGE

das