- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Miller, Micheal v. Mary Miller Paschal
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
MICHEAL MILLER,
Respondent Below, Appellant,
v.
MARY MILLER PASCHAL,
Petitioner Below, Appellee.
§
§ No. 86, 2026 §
§ Court Below—Court of § Chancery of the State § of Delaware
§
§ C.A. No. 2023-0733 §
§
§
Submitted: September 25, 2026 Decided: November 2, 2026 Before TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
ORDER
After considering the briefs and the record below, we find it evident that the Court of Chancery's judgment should be affirmed on the basis of the court's February 10, 2026 order approving the Magistrate in Chancery's final report issued January 29, 2026. The appellant did not file exceptions to the Magistrate's report and therefore did not preserve any issues for review on appeal.1
1 Furey v. Salaam, 350 A.3d 644, 2025 WL 3072471 (Del. Oct. 31 , 2025) (TABLE); see also Cowan v. Furlow, 327 A.3d 1088, 2024 WL 4362264, at *2 (Del. Sept. 30, 2024) ("This Court has long held that substantive challenges to a Magistrate's final report that are not raised in exceptions under Court of Chancery Rule 144 are not preserved for review on appeal to this Court.").
1
2
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow Justice
Alert