- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Amanov v. Rokosky
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Petitioner Khasan Amanov has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1). The Honorable Michael T. Morrissey, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 12), recommending that the Court grant the Petition in part.
The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) ("[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection."); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to."). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-taken. The Court will adopt the R&R and grant the Petition in part. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate"); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further Khasan Amanov,
Petitioner,
vs.
Eric Rokosky, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-26-02343-PHX-SPL
ORDER
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions."). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. That Magistrate Judge Michael T. Morrissey's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) is accepted and adopted by the Court;
2. That the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1) is granted in part and Petitioner shall be provided a bond determination hearing or bond hearing in the first instance;
3. That Respondents shall provide Petitioner such hearing within seven (7) business days of the entry of judgment;
4. That Respondents shall file a notice of compliance within three (3) days of providing Petitioner with a hearing;
5. That Petitioner's Motions for Status (Docs. 11 and 14) are granted to the extent of the explanation provided herein; and
6. That the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. Dated this 3rd day of August, 2026.
Honorable Steven P. Logan
United States District Judge
2
Alert