United States v. Espinoza-Estrada

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 26-10137

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Tadeo Espinoza-Estrada, Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:25-CR-257-1

______________________________

Before Jones, Ho, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:^*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Tadeo Espinoza- Estrada has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Espinoza-Estrada has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 3, 2026 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

1

No. 26-10137

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review but note a clerical error in the written judgment. Although the record indicates Espinoza-Estrada was convicted and sentenced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) only, the judgment cites "8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(1)/(2)."

Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The case is REMANDED to the district court for the limited purpose of correcting the error in the written judgment. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.

2