ROSINGANA v. OFFICE OF THE DIST. ATTORNEY FOR LYON CNTY. (CIVIL)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This appeal was docketed on April 21, 2026. Because the notice of appeal was not accompanied by the required proof of service, see NRAP 3(d)(1) (providing the notice of appeal must be served on all parties to the district court action and must "contain an acknowledgment of service or proof of service that conforms to the requirements of [NRAP] 25(d)"), on April 21, 2026, this court issued a notice directing appellant to provide this court with the required proof of service within 14 days. The notice advised that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this appeal. See NRAP 3(a)(2) ("An appellant's failure to take any step other than the timely filing of a notice of appeal does not affect the validity of the appeal, but is ground only for the court to act as it deems appropriate, including dismissing the app eal").

Because appellant had not filed proof of service of the notice of appeal or otherwise responded to this court's notice, on May 12, 2026, this court issued an order directing appellant to file proof of service of the notice of appeal within 14 days. Appellant was cautioned that failure to comply

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER

144) 1947 01S41.-

1