Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

JOHNSON v. DIST. CT. (GENERAL DYNAMICS INFO. TECH.) (CIVIL)

Supreme Court of Nevada
Feb 2, 2026

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

No. 91783

FEB 0 2 2026 ,

ELIZABETH A. BROWN

SLIPr 'Mr CUFT

BY.

AMINA JOHNSON,

Petitioner, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE

TIERRA DANIELLE JONES, DISTRICT

JUDGE,

Respondents, and

GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION

TECHNOLOGY; GENERAL

DYNAMICS; CARSON CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; JP MORGAN CHASE BANK;

THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

CARSON CITY; BROADSPIRE SERVICES INC.; DANIEL L. SCHWARTZ; AND SCOTT M.

MAHONEY,

Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a pro se original petition for a writ of mandamus seeking the enforcement of default judgments in four district court cases.' The petition raises essentially the same arguments as the petitions in Johnson 1Petitioner seeks emergency relief, however, petitioner does not demonstrate that the failure to grant her petition within 14 days will result in irreparable harm, see NRAP 21(a)(6); NRAP 27(e), and thus, we decline to treat this matter as an emergency.

To-

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

I947A

1

Herndon Parraguirre

v. Eighth Judicial District Court, Docket No. 91672, which was denied on December 8, 2025, and Johnson v. Eighth Judicial District Court, Docket No. 91744, which was denied on December 15, 2025.

Having reviewed the instant petition and accompanying appendix, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our extraordinary intervention is warranted, for the same reasons noted in the order denying the petitions in Docket No. 91672 and Docket No. 91744. See Pan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 107 Nev. 674, 677,

818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED. Stiglich

cc: Hon. Tierra Danielle Jones, District Judge Amina Johnson

Greenberg Traurig, LLP/Las Vegas

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(0) I947A

2

,p

2

Thorndal Armstrong/Reno Fisher & Phillips LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(ID) I947A

3

,....•• .

3