Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

U.S. Bank v. Woodland Vill.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 30, 2024

ROGER P. CROTEAU, ESQ. TIMOTHY E. RHODA, ESQ. ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Attorney for Defendant THUNDER PROPERTIES, INC.

AKERMAN, LLP SCOTT R. LACHMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12016 DONNA M. WITTIG, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY (SECOND REQUEST)

COMES NOW, Defendant, THUNDER PROPERTIES, INC., and Plaintiff, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE SPECIALTY UNDERWRITING AND

RESIDENTIAL FINANCE TRUST AND MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-BC4, by and through their undersigned counsel, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On March 26, 2024, Plaintiff caused a Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Protective Order or Motion to Stay Discovery to be filed herein. [ECF #91, 92, 93].
2. On April 8, 2024, the parties submitted a stipulation to extend the deadline to respond to the subject motions until April 30, 2024. [ECF #94]. Said stipulation was granted on April 9, 2024. [ECF #95].
3. Since the filing of the last stipulation, the parties have been actively engaged in settlement discussions. Settlement has been complicated by the involvement of interested parties that are not parties to the litigation. The parties believe that a settlement is reasonably possible and they wish to devote their resources to fully exploring an amicable resolution before expending additional funds on briefing.
4. Defendant has requested and shall be granted an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Protective Order or Motion to Stay Discovery until May 24, 2024.
5. This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purpose of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERER