Ctr. Way Co. v. The Individuals

RAAG SINGHAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

RAAG SINGHAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Paperless Report and Recommendation to District Judge (DE [49]), issued on March 27, 2023. Therein, Magistrate Judge Valle considered Defendant Presentime's Notice of Motion, Motion for Attorney's Fees, and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities (DE [46]) and recommended it be denied. The parties were given fourteen days to file any objections to the magistrate judge's factual findings and recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); S.D. Fla. Mag. J. R. 4(b).

Here, neither side filed any such objections. With no objections filed, the Court's review of the Report and Recommendation (DE [49]) is properly limited to a de novo review of only its legal conclusions. See Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. PharmaTech, LLC, 2019 WL 4673739, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 19, 2019) (“Legal conclusions are reviewed de novo, even in the absence of an objection.”). This Court has reviewed the entire file and record and has made a de novo review of the issues. No objections to the Report and Recommendation (DE [49]) have been filed, thus, the Court reviews it for clear error. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Magistrate Judge's Paperless Report and Recommendation to District Judge (DE [49]) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Defendant Presentime's Notice of Motion, Motion for Attorney's Fees, and Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities (DE [46]) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.