Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

In re G.A.H.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 1, 2023

ORDER ON PETITION FOR FURTHER REVIEW;

Issues Granted: Whether the trial court violated Appellant's due process rights, thus prejudicing Appellant:

i) whether Appellant's due process rights were violated by the court's refusal to continue the trial so as to allow Appellant to testify;

ii) whether Appellant's due process rights were violated by the court's refusal to allow appellant's trial counsel to cross-examine the Guardian Ad Litem or call other witnesses on behalf of Appellant; and

iii) whether these violations of Appellant's due process rights were prejudicial to Appellant. In addition, the court directed the parties to specifically address, in their briefs, the issue of whether the alleged due process violations identified in the issues above are subject to harmless error review.

Granted