- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Farris v. The Orvis Co.
THE HONORABLE CHRISTINA REISS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Aaron T. Morris MORRIS KANDINOV LLP Frank S. Hedin (admitted pro hac vice) Arun G. Ravindran (admitted pro hac vice) HEDIN HALL LLP Counsel for Plaintiffs
Stephen J. Soule PAUL FRANK + COLLINS Robyn M. Feldstein (admitted pro hac vice) BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP Casie D. Collignon (admitted pro hac vice) BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP Counsel for Defendant
STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS
THE HONORABLE CHRISTINA REISS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiffs Brian Farris, Lance Groff, and Tom Theus and Defendant The Orvis Company, Inc. (collectively “the Parties”), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Motion for Attorneys' and Costs (the “Motion”) on November 23, 2022 (ECF No. 27);
WHEREAS, under Local Rule 7(a)(3)(B), Plaintiffs' opposition to the Motion is due December 7, 2022; and
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal on December 3, 2022 (ECF No. 30);
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, through their respective undersigned counsel and subject to the Court's approval hereby stipulate and agree that:
1. In light of the pending appeal, any further action or briefing on the Motion should be stayed until the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit resolves the appeal; and
2. After the appeal is resolved, the Parties shall meet and confer, and thereafter file a proposed briefing schedule that complies with Fed.R.Civ.P. 54.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Alert