Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Sectra Commc'ns AB v. Absolute Software, Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Oct 3, 2022

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Christopher B. Durbin (WSBA #41159) COOLEY LLP, Heidi L. Keefe (pro hac vice pending) Reuben H. Chen (pro hac vice pending) Alexandra Leeper(pro hac vice pending) Attorneys for Defendants ABSOLUTE SOFTWARE, INC. and NETMOTION SOFTWARE, INC.,

CORR CRONIN LLP William R. Squires III, WSBA No. 4976, MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY Stephen M. Hash (pro hac vice) Kevin J. Meek (pro hac vice) Syed K. Fareed (pro hac vice) Samoneh Schickel (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff SECTRA COMMUNICATIONS AB

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING NOTING DATE AND BRIEFING FOR DEFENDANT NETMOTION SOFTWARE, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COUNTERCLAIM

NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: SEPTEMBER 30, 2022

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The parties to the above-captioned action (the “Parties”), submit the below stipulation pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7(l) for review and approval by the Court:

WHEREAS, the Parties have engaged in good-faith meet-and-confer discussions regarding the need for jurisdictional discovery in connection with Defendant NetMotion Software Inc.'s (“NetMotion”) Motion for Leave to Amend (Dkt. No. 99) (the “Motion for Leave”);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Sectra Communications AB (“Sectra”) filed a declaration from Sectra, Inc. employee Tobias Englund in support of Sectra's opposition to the Motion for Leave (Dkt. No. 102-1);

WHEREAS, Sectra has agreed to make its declarant Tobias Englund available for deposition;

WHEREAS, NetMotion has filed a Motion to Seek Jurisdictional Discovery (Dkt. No. 109) (the “Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery”), with a noting date of October 7, 2022;

WHEREAS, Sectra intends to oppose NetMotion's Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery;

WHEREAS, jurisdictional discovery, if allowed, may impact the deposition of Mr. Englund;

WHEREAS, Mr. Englund's deposition, and jurisdictional discovery if allowed, may be relevant to NetMotion's pending Motion for Leave;

WHEREAS, to allow time for the Court to consider NetMotion's Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery before the deposition of Mr. Englund, the Parties agree that the Noting Date on NetMotion's Motion for Leave should be extended to November 18, 2022; and

WHEREAS, to address any relevance of jurisdictional discovery and the Englund deposition on NetMotion's Motion for Leave, NetMotion may file a 6-page supplemental reply brief in support of the Motion for Leave by November 14, 2022 and Sectra may file a 6-page sur-reply brief in opposition to the Motion for Leave by November 18, 2022.

THEREFORE, the Parties hereby STIPULATE that the noting date on Defendant NetMotion Software Inc.'s motion for leave to amend be extended to November 18, 2022; that NetMotion be granted leave to file a 6-page supplemental reply brief in support of the motion for leave to amend by November 14, 2022; and that Sectra be granted leave to file a 6-page sur-reply brief in opposition to the motion for leave to amend by November 18, 2022.

SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.