Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

United States v. Whitmore

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 1, 2022

THE HONORABLE ANDREW P. GORDON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Lisa A. Rasmussen, Esq.

The Law Offices of Kristina

Wildeveld & Associates

Attorneys for Defendant Sylviane Whitmore

Hill Law Firm

DANIEL HILL, ESQ.

Counsel for Larry McDaniel

JASON FRIERSON

United States Attorney

RICHARD ANTHONY LOPEZ

Assistant United States Attorney

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY

THE HONORABLE ANDREW P. GORDON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The parties, Sylviane Whitmore, by and through her counsel, Lisa A. Rasmussen, Larry McDaniel, by and through his counsel, Daniel Hill, and the United States, by and through its counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Richard Anthony Lopez, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Presently, Defendants' Reply to their Motion for New Trial is due on today's date.

2. Due to other pending deadlines of the undersigned counsel for Defendants, the undersigned seek a 30 day extension of time to file their Reply and request that they be permitted to file it on or before Monday, August 29, 2022.

3. The government does not oppose this extension of time. It will likely be necessary for the parties to move to extend the presently scheduled sentencing dates and the parties will address that issue at a later date in consultation with the Court.

4. Denial of this request would cause prejudice to the Defendants Whitmore and McDaniel and this request for an extension of time is not made for the purpose of delay.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants to file their Reply to the Motion for New Trial is hereby extended to August 29, 2022.