- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Hutchinson v. Perley
Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1854
JUDGES: Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt delivered the opinion of the Court. Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred.
OPINION
HEYDENFELDT, Judge
Possession is always prima facie evidence of title, and proof of prior possession is enough to maintain ejectment against a mere naked trespasser.
The allegation that the plaintiff was in possession at the the time of the ouster complained of, is a sufficient allegation of title to make the declaration good.
The demurrer was, therefore, improperly sustained.
The judgment is reversed with costs, and the cause remanded.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.