Boyle v. Hitchcock

         OPINION

         THE COURT

         We are of opinion that the objection to the assessment in this case, that it included an amount, as incidental expenses, for engineering and printing, was waived by a failure to appeal to the board of supervisors. (§ 12 of the act of 1872; Stats. 1871-2, p. 815.)

         We are also of the opinion that the resolution [4 P. 1144] of intention sufficiently described the work which the board of supervisors desired to have done.

         Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed.