Kelly v. Bradbury

         JUDGES: Fitzgerald, J. McFarland, J., and De Haven, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          FITZGERALD, Judge

         It appears from the record that the verdict of the jury is assailed by the specifications, on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support it.

         There is no brief on file by respondent, nor was the case orally argued in his behalf; it therefore follows, on the authority of Richter v. Fresno etc. Co ., 101 Cal. 582, and Davis v. Hart , 103 Cal. 530, that the judgment and order appealed from should be reversed.

         So ordered