Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

McClellan v. Marshall

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 3, 2009
GREGORY McCLELLAN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MARSHALL, et al., Defendants. No. CV 08-2293-JFW (JEM) United States District Court, C.D. California. August 3, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JOHN F. WALTER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files in this case, along with the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) defendants' Motion to Dismiss the claims against them pursuant to Rule 12(b)[unenumerated] is granted; (2) the claims against the Doe defendants are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B); and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.