- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
State v. Newell
PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Submitted May 1, 2012
Appeal From York County John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Tommy Evans, Jr. and J. Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM
Nicholas Shane Newell appeals his probation revocation, arguing his due process rights were violated as the arrest warrant does not indicate that he was provided a preliminary hearing upon his arrest. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
Alert