- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Hayline Chambers
PER CURIAM.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
Submitted September 11, 2019
Appeal From Cherokee County Usha J. Bridges, Family Court Judge.
Amanda Mange Scott, of Parnell & Parnell, P.A., of White Rock, for Appellant.
Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.
Harry A. Hancock, of Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM.
Hayline Chambers appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Chambers's counsel.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.
Alert