Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Aspen Med. Prods. v. Breg, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
May 2, 2022

Hon. Mitchell D. Dembin, United States Magistrate Judge.

SECOND AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER REGULATING DISCOVERY AND OTHER PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN A PATENT CASE [ECF NO. 56]

Hon. Mitchell D. Dembin, United States Magistrate Judge.

On April 7, 2022, United States District Judge Janis L. Sammartino continued the claim construction hearing to June 23, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4D. (ECF No. 53). Thereafter, Plaintiff Aspen Medical Products, LLC and Defendant Breg, Inc. jointly moved to continue the discovery deadlines. (ECF No. 56). Upon due consideration, good cause appearing, and in accordance with the Patent Local Rules, the Court GRANTS the parties' joint motion and AMENDS the Scheduling Order as follows:

1. The initial date for the substantial completion of document discovery including electronically stored information (“ESI”) is August 23, 2022. See Patent L.R. 2.1(a)(1).

2. All fact discovery shall be completed by all parties on or before October 24, 2022.

3. All expert disclosures required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) shall be served on all parties on or before August 23, 2022. Any contradictory or rebuttal disclosures within the meaning of Rule 26(a)(2)(D)(ii) shall be disclosed on or before September 13, 2022. Unless otherwise stipulated by the parties, the required expert disclosures shall include an expert report as required by Rule 26(a)(2)(B). If a written report is not required, the disclosure must provide the information required under Rule 26(a)(2)(c).

4. All discovery, including expert discovery, shall be completed by all parties on or before January 17, 2023. “Completed” means that interrogatories, requests for production, and other discovery requests must be served at least thirty (30) days prior to the established cutoff date so that response thereto will be due on or before the cutoff date. All subpoenas issued for discovery must be returnable on or before the discovery cutoff date. All disputes concerning discovery shall be brought the attention of the Magistrate Judge no later than forty-five (45) days following the date upon which the event giving rise to the dispute occurred. Counsel are required to meet and confer regarding all discovery disputes pursuant to the requirements of Local Rule 26.1(a). Counsel are to comply with the chambers rules of the Magistrate Judge in bringing discovery before the court.

5. All other dispositive motions, including those addressing Daubert issues, shall be FILED on or before January 31, 2023. Please be advised that counsel for the moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will hear the motion. Failure of counsel to timely request a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. Motions in Limine are to be filed as directed in the Local Rules, or as otherwise set by Judge Janis L. Sammartino.

6. Briefs or memoranda in support of or in opposition to any pending motion shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length without permission of the judge or magistrate judge who will hear the motion. No reply memorandum shall exceed ten (10) pages without leave of the judge or magistrate judge who will hear the motion.

7. In order to identify the claims to be tried and eliminate delay and surprise at trial, the Court enters the following pretrial order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16.

8. Parties are excused from the requirement of Local Rule 16.1(f)(2)(a); no Memoranda of Law or Contentions of Fact are to be filed.

9. All parties or their counsel shall fully comply with the Pretrial Disclosure requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(3) on or before March 9, 2023. Failure to comply with these disclosures requirements could result in evidence preclusion or other sanctions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 37.

10. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.1(f)(4), on or before March 16, 2023, the parties shall meet and confer to comply with the provisions of that section and prepare a proposed pretrial order in accordance with Local Rule 16.1(f)(6)(c), and containing the following:

a. A joint neutral statement to be read to the jury, not in excess of one page, of the nature of the case and the claims and defenses.

b. A list of the causes of action to be tried, referenced to the Complaint [and Counterclaim if applicable]. For each cause of action, the order shall succinctly list the elements of the claim, damages and any defenses. A cause of action in the Complaint [and/or Counterclaim] which is not listed shall be dismissed with prejudice.

c. A list, in alphabetical order, of:

i. Each witness counsel actually expect to call at trial with a brief statement, not exceeding four sentences, of the substance of the witnesses' testimony.
ii. Each expert witness counsel actually expect to call at trial with a brief statement, not exceeding four sentences, of the substance of the expert witnesses' testimony.
iii. Additional witnesses, including experts, counsel do not expect to call at this time but reserve the right to call at trial along with a brief statement, not exceeding four sentences, of the substance of the witnesses' testimony.

d. A list of:

i. All exhibits that counsel actually expect to offer at trial with a one-sentence description of the exhibit. All exhibits are to be identified numerically, plaintiff starting with “1” and defendant beginning with an agreed upon numerical designation.
ii. All other exhibits that counsel do not expect to offer at this time but reserve the right to offer if necessary at trial with a one-sentence description of the exhibit.

e. A statement of all facts to which the parties stipulate. This statement shall be on a separate page and will be read to and provided to the jury.

f. A list of all deposition transcripts by page and line, or videotape depositions by section, that will be offered at trial.

g. Counsel will note any objections they have to any other parties' Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 (a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures.

The Court encourages the parties to consult with the assigned magistrate judge to work out any problems in preparation of the proposed pretrial order. Judge Janis L. Sammartino will entertain any questions concerning the conduct of the trial at the pretrial conference.

27. Counsel for plaintiff will be responsible for preparing the pretrial order and arranging the meetings of counsel pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(6)(a). On or before March 23, 2023, plaintiff's counsel must provide opposing counsel with the proposed pretrial order for review and approval. Opposing counsel must communicate promptly with plaintiff's attorney concerning any objections to form or content of the pretrial order, and both parties should attempt promptly to resolve their differences, if any, concerning the order.

28. The proposed final pretrial conference order, including objections counsel have to any other party's Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures shall be prepared, served and lodged with Judge Janis L. Sammartino chambers on or before March 30, 2023, and shall be in the form prescribed in and in compliance with Local Rule 16.1(f)(6)(c). Counsel shall also bring a court copy of the pretrial order to the pretrial conference.

29. The final pretrial conference shall be held before the Honorable Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Court Judge, on April 6, 2023 at 1:30 p.m., during which time the Court will address the submission of motions in limine, trial briefs, proposed voir dire and jury instructions and the trial schedule.

30. The dates and times set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown.

31. Plaintiff's counsel shall serve a copy of this order on all parties that enter this case hereafter.

32. All other dates and guidelines remain as previously set. (See ECF Nos. 28 and 50).

IT IS SO ORDERED.