Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Edwards v. Okla. Cnty. Det. Ctr. Tr.

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Aug 2, 2021

STEPHEN P. FRIOT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

STEPHEN P. FRIOT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Leellis Edwards, a state prisoner appearing pro se, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983.

Before the court is Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell's Report and Recommendation of June 28, 2021. Doc. no. 8 (the Report). The Report recommends the court dismiss this action without prejudice under Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., based on plaintiff's failure to prosecute and follow the court's orders and rules.

The Report advised plaintiff of the right to object to the Report by July 19, 2021. The Report also advised that failure to timely object to the Report would waive appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report. No objection has been filed, and plaintiff has not sought an extension of time within which to object to the Report.

Upon review, and with no objection to the Report having been filed, the Report is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. As recommended in the Report, this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice under Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., for failure to prosecute and follow the court's orders and rules as set out in more detail in the Report.

IT IS SO ORDERED.