Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ
 

People v. Lewis

Supreme Court of California
Jul 26, 2021
Smart Summary (Beta)

Factual and Procedural Background

This opinion addresses the appeal of Vince E. Lewis, defendant and appellant, in a case brought by the People as plaintiff and respondent. The procedural history includes appellate review by the Second Appellate District, Division One, following proceedings in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County before Judge Ricardo R. Ocampo. The opinion was authored by Justice Groban with concurrence from the Chief Justice and other justices.

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The provided text does not contain substantive legal analysis or reasoning. The opinion is limited to procedural and representational details without elaboration on the court's application of law to facts.

Holding and Implications

This information was not available in the provided opinion. The text does not specify the court's final ruling or its implications for the parties or legal precedent.

Show all summary ...

GROBAN, J.

Second Appellate District, Division One B295998

Superior Court Los Angeles County TA117431 Ricardo R. Ocampo Judge

Robert D. Bacon, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.

Sara Ross, Stephen Dunkle and John T. Philipsborn for California Attorneys for Criminal Justice as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Kate Chatfield for Senator Nancy Skinner and The Justice Collaborative Institute as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Sean Riordan, Summer Lacey and David Loy for American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California and American Civil Liberties Union of San Diego and Imperial Counties as Amici Curie on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Xavier Becerra and Rob Bonta, Attorneys General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Susan Sullivan Pithey, Assistant Attorney General, Michael R. Johnsen, Idan Ivri and Amanda V. Lopez, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Mark Zahner and Nicole C. Rooney, Deputy District Attorney (San Diego), for California District Attorneys Association as Amicus Curiae for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Justice Groban authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and Justices Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, Kruger, and Jenkins concurred.

OPINION

GROBAN, J.