Doe v. Rollins College

ROY B. DALTON JR., United States District Judge

ORDER

ROY B. DALTON JR., United States District Judge

On March 25, 2021, Defendant filed a proposed Bill of Costs, seeking $13, 846.95. (Doc. 206.) Plaintiff objected the Bill of Costs, arguing Defendant failed to describe the expenses with particularity or provide proof of payment for the costs. (Doc. 208.) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman recommends sustaining in part and overruling in part Plaintiff's objections and recommends awarding Defendant $6, 467.18 in costs. (Doc. 233 (“R&R”).)

No party objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has passed. Absent objection, the Court examined the R&R only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety.

It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. U.S. Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 233) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order.

2. Plaintiffs Objections to Defendant's Bill of Costs (Doc. 208) are SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part.

3. Defendant is AWARDED taxable costs in the amount of $6, 467.18.

4. The remainder of Defendant's requested costs are DENIED.

AND ORDERED.