Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Fremgen v. Didier (In re Didier)

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Feb 3, 2021

Per Curiam.

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Cherie L. Clark, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Joseph K. Nwoga, Assistant State's Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee. Tyler J. Morrow, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Lawrence Didier appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment. Didier argues the order denying his discharge from civil commitment was not supported by clear and convincing evidence he remains a sexually dangerous individual. Under our modified clearly erroneous standard of review, we conclude the district court's findings of fact and order are supported by clear and convincing evidence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte