Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

In re Mitnick

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
Sep 9, 2020

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 134-19, concluding that Craig R. Mitnick of Haddonfield, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.8(a) (improper business transaction with a client);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Craig R. Mitnick is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

WITNESS, the Honorable Stuart Rabner, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 9th day of September, 2020.

/s/

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT