Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Vanderbilt Mortg. & Fin., Inc. v. Ammon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 29, 2020

Mulholland & Knapp, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Robert P. Knapp III of counsel), for appellant.

Brooklyn Legal Services, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Melissa Ysaguirre of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., JEFFREY A. COHEN, ROBERT J. MILLER, SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, with one bill of costs.

The appeals from the amended orders must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of an order and judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647 ). The issues raised on the appeals from the amended orders are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the order and judgment ( Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. v. Ammon, ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2020 WL 465131 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2018–04803; decided herewith]; see CPLR 5501[a][1] ).

RIVERA, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.