- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Fontenot v. Halliburton Co.
Porter, Scofield & Cox, Lake Charles, La., for plaintiff.
Plauche & Plauche, Lake Charles, La., for defendant.
EDWIN F. HUNTER, Jr., District Judge:
Alleging that he is a 'seaman' and demanding recovery under the Jones Act, plaintiff orings this suit against his employer, Halliburton, a company engaged, among other activities, in servicing oil rigs. This suit was filed on November 30, 1965. It came on for trial October 28, 1966, on the single issue of whether the plaintiff was a seaman and member of a crew of a vessel within the meaning and purview of the Jones Act. The Court makes findings on this issue:
46 U.S.C.A. ยง 688.
1. On December 29, 1962, and some time prior thereto, plaintiff was an employee of Halliburton. 2. Plaintiff, on or about December 29, 1962, was allegedly injured while working on Kerr-McGee Rig No. 46 in the Gulf of Mexico, offshore from Cameron, Louisiana. 3. Kerr-McGee Rig No. 46 is a special purpose drilling vessel owned by Kerr-McGee and drilling under contract for J. Ray McDermott on the alleged date of the accident. 4. Halliburton was neither the owner, the charterer, nor the lessee of Kerr-McGee Rig No. 46. 5. Fontenot was employed as a cementer's helper. His sole responsibility was the operation and maintenance of the Halliburton equipment when it was temporarily aboard Kerr-McGee Rig No. 46. He did not operate the rig or any of its appurtenances, did not drill, run pipe, roll pipe, operate or handle any of the rig equipment. 6. Fontenot was assigned to various jobs on a rotating basis with other Halliburton employees. There was no permanent assignment. He did not perform a substantial portion of his duties aboard Kerr-McGee Rig No. 46 or aboard any group of specific vessels. 7. Fontenot's work assignment with regard to any job or structure was transitory, connected solely with Halliburton services, and terminated with the completion of the specified services rendered. 8. Fontenot worked indiscriminately on land and offshore as the location of the job required. 9. Attached hereto are Exhibits 1 and 2 which reveal Fontenot's work history and assignments for the ten (10) week period immediately preceding the accident.
CONCLUSION
In the past forty years, we have seen a tremendous expansion of the 'seaman' concept far beyond the traditional interpretation of that term. As recently as May of this year, the Fifth Circuit seems to have completed the circle (Gianfala v. Texas Company, 350 U.S. 879, 76 S.Ct. 141, 100 L.Ed. 775) and has now ruled that a worker more or less permanently attached to a submersible drilling barge may be a seaman as a matter of law. Producers Drilling Company v. Gray (5th Cir., 1966), 361 F.2d 432. In the instant case Kerr-McGee Rig No. 46 is a vessel, and the fact that Halliburton did not own or operate the rig does not deprive Fontenot of his seaman's status. The fundamental attack on plaintiff's status is pegged on the fact that he was not 'more or less' permanently assigned to a vessel. It is apparent that Fontenot was never permanently assigned to a specified vessel, or a group of specified vessels. It is apparent, too, that he did not do a substantial part of his work on a specified vessel or a group of specified vessels.
The facts here are similar to those in Rotolo v. Halliburton (5th Cir., 1963), 317 F.2d 9. We find that Fontenot was not a 'seaman' within the meaning of the Jones Act. Accordingly, judgment is granted for defendant.
EXHIBIT 1
WORK HISTORY AND DAYS AND PERCENTAGES 8/5/62 through12/30/62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total days
148 days
100%
Total days "on call" or
"days off"
60 days
41%
Total days sick
5 days
3%
Exclusive inland work
23 days
16%
Exclusive offshore work
21 days
14%
Total days part inland and
39 days
26%
Days including part inland and part offshore work are comprised of all days wherein plaintiff traveled from Lake Charles to the offshore rig, including waiting time for transportation to rig and all days where plaintiff traveled from offshore rig to Lake Charles. On these days plaintiff also performed work on the offshore locations. A further breakdown from the records is impossible since there is no accurate measure of total time en route and total time working. The days also include inland work performed by plaintiff preparatory to going offshore.
EXHIBIT 2
TABULATION OF CLAIMANT'S SERVICE JOBS AUGUST 6,1962, through DECEMBER 31, 1962
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CEMENTING SERVICE INVOICE AND TICKET
DATE
NUMBER & FIELD LOCATION
HALLIBURTON EQUIPMENT & IDENTIFICATION #
-------------
------------
------------------
----------------
CS 746795
8-6-62
#A-78 Gulfland
Truck HT-400
Hackberry, La.
6770 H.V.
CS 746911
8-10-62
#1 Mecom
Truck 6939
Johnson Bayou
T-HT 400
CS 746912
8-11-62
#4 Layne
Truck HT 400
Gillis
6939
CS 746959
8-16-62
#D-3 W. Hackberry
Truck HT 400
6408
CS 746735
8-20-62
#1 OCS 0917
Skid Unit #162
Blk, 312 W.Cameron
CS 746736
8-24-62
#4 OCS 0558
Skid Unit #226
Blk 66--Vermilion
CS 746737
8-26-62
#1 OCS 0917
Skid Unit #162
Blk 321 W. Cameron
CS 746738
9-1-62
#D-1 OCS 0265
Skid Unit #114
West Cameron
CS 746739
9-4-62
#1 Bonita
Skid Unit #160
Blk 114 Vermilion
CS 746740
9-7-62
#2 OCS 0902
Skid Unit #176
Blk 229 West Cameron
CS 746741
9-9-62
#2 OCS 0902
Skid Unit #176
Blk 229 West Cameron
CS 746742
9-15-62
#1 Stil 5163839
Skid Unit #174
Blk 117 West Cameron
CS 746718
10-2-62
#4 OCS 0562
Skid Unit #203
Blk 77 Vermilion
CS 746745
10-19-62
#2 State Lease 3760
Skid Unit #174
W. Cameron Blk 6
CS 746746
10-20-62
#3 State Lease 3535
Skid Unit #168
E. Cameron Blk 17
CS 746747
10-22-62
"
Skid Unit #168
CS 746748
10-25-62
#1 OCS 0220
Skid Unit #156
State Lease 1430
CS 746749
11-2-62
3 Bonita B
Skid Unit 160
Vermilion Blk 114
FS 145775
11-13-62
A-1 Harmony
Truck #6427
Ged. (Land)
Twin HT 400
CS 929786
11-16-62
Choats Creek Field
Truck #6427
(Land)
Twin HT 400
CS 929726
11-15-62
B-1 Bonita
Skid Unit #160
Vermilion Blk 114
CS 929727
11-16-62
B-1 Bonita
Skid Unit #160
Vermilion Blk 114
CS 929728
11-17-62
"
"
CS 929729
11-19-62
"
"
CS 929730
11-30-62
#1 OCS 0681
Skid Unit #121
Blk 25 (E. Cameron)
CS 929731
12-1-62
#7 State Lease 1172
Skid Unit #151
Blk 9 (E. Cameron)
CS 929750
12-3-62
E1 OCS 0265
Skid Unit #114
E. Cameron Blk 33
CS 929501
12-15-62
#2 OCS 0925
Skid Unit #136
W. Cameron
CS 929502
12-17-62
#7 State Lease 1172
Skid Unit #151
E. Cameron Blk 9
CS 929503
12-19-62
E1 OCS 0265
Skid Unit #114
W. Cameron Blk 33
CS 929734
12-30-62
E1 OCS 0684
Skid Unit #168
W. Cameron Blk 68
Pan American & Brewster & Barthe
Land
Inland Barge
Cities Service & Prince Marine
Land
Inland Barge
Sun Oil & Glasscock Chapman
Land
Inland Barge
Pan American & Allied Well Service
Land
Land Rig
British American & Kerr-McGee
Offshore
Special Drilling Vessel
Pure Oil & La. Delta Offshore
Offshore
"
British American & Kerr McGee
Offshore
"
J. Ray McDermott & The Offshore Co.
Offshore
"
Phillips & Odeco
Offshore
"
Forest Oil & Zapata Offshore
Offshore
"
Forest Oil & Zapata
Offshore
"
California & Rowan
Offshore
"
Tenneco & Penrod
Offshore
"
California & Rowan
Offshore
"
Tenneco & Kerr-McGee
Offshore
"
"
"
"
Sohio & Odeco
Offshore
"
Phillips & Odeco
Offshore
"
Creole
Land
Land Rig
Sunray & Ward Well Service
Land
Land Rig
Phillips & Odeco
Offshore
Special Drilling Vessel
Phillips & Odeco
Offshore
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
Street & Zapata
Offshore
"
Natural Gas Odeco
Offshore
"
J. Ray McDermott & Offshore 53
Offshore
"
Union & Reading & Bates
Offshore
Stationary Platform
Natural Gas & Odeco
Offshore
Special Drilling Vessel
J. Ray McDermott & Offshore
Offshore
"
J. Ray McDermott & Kerr-McGee
Offshore
"
Alert