Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Cirwithian v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Dec 20, 2019

Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice

Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware Cr. ID Nos. 1812014043 (N) 1812006782 (N) Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VAUGHN, and TRAYNOR, Justices. ORDER

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant's response, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The Court received a letter from Joshua Cirwithian, a criminal defendant who is represented by counsel in the Superior Court. Based upon its contents and a review of the Superior Court docket, the Clerk deemed the letter to be a notice of appeal from Cirwithian's conviction in the Superior Court following trial.

(2) Under the Delaware Constitution, this Court may review only a final judgment in a criminal case. Because the docket indicated that Cirwithian had not yet been sentenced, the Chief Deputy Clerk sent a notice to Cirwithian directing him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for the Court's lack of jurisdiction to entertain an interlocutory appeal in a criminal case. In response, Cirwithian contends that the State did not prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and raises other challenges to the merits of his conviction.

DEL. CONST. art. IV, ยง 11(1)(b); Gottlieb v. State, 697 A.2d 400, 401-02 (Del. 1997).

(3) "Under settled Delaware constitutional law only a final judgment in a criminal case is reviewable in this Court." Because Cirwithian has not yet been sentenced for his convictions, his appeal is interlocutory, and this Court has no jurisdiction to consider it.

Rash v. State, 318 A.2d 603, 604 (Del. 1974).

Potts v. State, 2018 WL 6015781 (Del. Nov. 15, 2018). --------

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J . Seitz, Jr.

Chief Justice