Yu v. Neall

PER CURIAM

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-03260-JKB) Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Xiao-Ying Yu, Appellant Pro Se. James Nelson Lewis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Xiao-Ying Yu appeals the district court's order dismissing her civil action that alleged claims of workplace discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yu v. Neall, No. 1:17-cv-03260-JKB (D. Md. June 26, 2018). We deny as moot Yu's "Motion for Concerns of the Docket Records." We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED