Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

State v. Elmore

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Feb 7, 2018

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Aiken County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant. General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HILL, JJ., concur.