- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
In re Studio Palmera, LLC
Factual and Procedural Background
On May 27, 2010, an unclaimed dividend of $1,397.49 was deposited into the court's registry pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 347(a) following a bankruptcy case under Chapter 7 involving Studio Palmera, LLC. On June 4, 2012, Bank of America, on behalf of itself and its subsidiary FIA Card Services, N.A., filed an application for the release of these unclaimed funds. The funds remain on deposit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041 and 2042. The court reviewed the application and the circumstances surrounding the unclaimed funds to determine whether Bank of America is presently entitled to the release of the funds.
Legal Issues Presented
- Whether Bank of America has demonstrated a present entitlement to the unclaimed funds held in the court's registry.
- Whether the court should grant the application for release of unclaimed funds absent proof that the underlying debt has not been previously satisfied.
Arguments of the Parties
The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.
Table of Precedents Cited
| Precedent | Rule or Principle Cited For | Application by the Court |
|---|---|---|
| Hansen v. United States, 340 F.2d 142, 144 (8th Cir. 1965) | Burden on claimant to demonstrate entitlement to unclaimed funds. | The court applied this principle to place the burden on Bank of America to prove present entitlement to the funds. |
| Willametz v. Susi, 489 F.2d 364, 366 (1st Cir. 1973) | Requirement for full proof of right to withdraw unclaimed funds from court registry. | The court relied on this precedent to require Bank of America to provide satisfactory evidence beyond the original claim and check issuance to establish present entitlement. |
| Harris v. Balk, 198 U.S. 215, 226 (1905) | Courts' objective to prevent payment of any debt twice over. | The court cited this case to emphasize that if Bank of America's claim has been satisfied by other means, it is not entitled to receive the unclaimed funds again. |
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The court analyzed the application in light of statutory provisions 11 U.S.C. § 347(a), and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041 and 2042, which govern the handling of unclaimed funds in bankruptcy cases. The court noted that while Bank of America was once entitled to the funds, it failed to demonstrate a current entitlement as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2042, which mandates full proof of right to withdraw such funds. The application did not explain why the original distribution check was uncashed, nor did it certify that the underlying debt remains unpaid. The court also observed discrepancies in the address information provided by Bank of America and emphasized the necessity to prevent double payment of debts. Without adequate evidence showing the debt has not been satisfied by other means, the court declined to release the funds.
Holding and Implications
DENIED the application for release of unclaimed funds without prejudice.
The court's decision denies Bank of America's application to release the unclaimed funds because it has not demonstrated a present entitlement. The ruling requires Bank of America to file an amended application with full proof of right to the funds, including an explanation for why the funds went unclaimed and certification that the debt remains unpaid. This decision directly affects the parties by withholding the funds until proper entitlement is established and does not set new precedent beyond enforcing existing statutory requirements.
S. Martin Teel
The order below is hereby signed.
_______________
, Jr.
United States Bankruptcy Judge
(Chapter 7) Not for Publication in West's Bankruptcy Reporter
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR RELEASE OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS
On June 4, 2012, Bank of America, on behalf of itself and its subsidiary, FIA Card Services, N.A., filed an application for release of unclaimed funds in the amount of $1,397.49 (Dkt. No. 65). On May 27, 2010, the unclaimed dividend in question was deposited into the court's registry pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 347(a), and the funds remain on deposit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041 and 2042. Absent a showing by Bank of America that the debt once payable to it has not been previously satisfied, the court will not grant the relief sought.
11 U.S.C. § 347(a) provides, in relevant part:
Ninety days after final distribution under section . . . 1326 of this title in a case under chapter 7, 12, or 13 of this title . . . the trustee shall stop payment on any check remaining unpaid, and any remaining property of the estate shall be paid into the court and disposed of under chapter 129 of title 28 [ 28 USC §§ 2041 et seq.].
The burden is on Bank of America to demonstrate that it is entitled to the funds sought. Hansen v. United States, 340 F.2d 142, 144 (8th Cir. 1965). Although the record before the court demonstrates that Bank of America was at one time entitled to the funds, it has not demonstrated a present entitlement, as required. See 28 U.S.C. § 2042; Willametz v. Susi, 489 F.2d 364, 366 (1st Cir. 1973).
28 U.S.C. § 2042 provides:
No money deposited under section 2041 of this title shall be withdrawn except by order of the court.
In every case in which a right to withdraw money deposited in court under section 2041 has been adjudicated or is not in dispute and such money has remained so deposited for at least five years unclaimed by the person entitled thereto, such court shall cause such money to be deposited in the Treasury in the name and to the credit of the United States. Any claimant entitled to such money may, on petition to the court and upon notice to the United States attorney and full proof of right thereto, obtain an order directing payment to him. [Emphasis added.]
The application does not indicate why the check went uncashed, and although the funds were originally distributed by check made payable to Bank of America pursuant to an allowed claim, the court is not willing to deem this satisfactory evidence, standing alone, of Wells Fargo Bank's present entitlement to the funds. See Willametz, 489 F.2d at 366.
The court notes that the trustee's notice of unclaimed dividend lists an address for Bank of America that is incomplete when compared with the address provided by Bank of America on its proof of claim.
If Bank of America elects to file an amended application, it should use the court's standard form application (copy attached), which prompts the applicant to address the issue of why the funds went unclaimed, to certify that the debt remains unpaid, and to provide supporting account records.
If Bank of America's claim that was the basis for the issuance of the distribution has already been satisfied through some other source, such as a voluntary payment made by the debtor or a payment by a co-obligor, circumstances have changed such that Bank of America is no longer entitled to the funds. Id. at 367 (quoting Harris v. Balk, 198 U.S. 215, 226 (1905) ("It ought to be and is the object of courts to prevent the payment of any debt twice over."). Any overpayment that might result from payment of the unclaimed funds to Wells Fargo Bank is not simply a matter to be resolved by Wells Fargo and the debtor. Instead, § 2042 requires that the court determine Bank of America's entitlement to the funds. It is thus
ORDERED that Bank of America's application for release of unclaimed funds (Dkt. No. 65) is DENIED without prejudice to the filing of an amended application demonstrating a present day entitlement to the funds.
[Signed and dated above.]
Copies to:
Bank of America
c/o The Locator Services Group
280 Summer St., Suite 701
Boston, MA 02210
IN RE: ___, Debtor.
Case No.: ___
(Chapter ___)
APPLICATION FOR RELEASE OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2042 AND BANKRUPTCY RULE 3011 AND NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO OPPOSE THE APPLICATION
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2042 and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011, ___, Applicant, reports as follows:
1. Application is hereby made for unclaimed funds that are owed to the Applicant in this case in the amount of $ ___. ___. These funds were deposited into the Registry of the Court pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 347 after a check to ___ for the sum was not cashed.
2. The reason why the funds went unclaimed is that _______________
3. The Applicant certifies that the Applicant is the entity entitled to a return of the unclaimed funds. If the payee on the check was a creditor in the case, the claim of the creditor has not been satisfied from other sources, and the amount of the claim that remains unpaid is equal to or exceeds the amount of the unclaimed funds.
4. An account record regarding amounts owed on the debt:
[] was not maintained;
[] was maintained and a copy of the page stating the balance currently owed is attached hereto;
[] was maintained but is unavailable because _______________ but I can certify that the debt remains unpaid because _______________
5. I have attached hereto ___ page(s) (if any) further explaining my Application and ___ page(s) of documents in support of this Application. Each document is a true copy of a genuine document. I am additionally separately filing a Statement of Social Security Number or Taxpayer Identification Number in Support of Application for Release of Unclaimed Funds.
See the instructions contained in the court website's Information Regarding Unclaimed Funds for the documents that must accompany application.
--------
6. The Applicant requests that the said unclaimed funds be returned to: I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this ___ day of ___, ___.
Signature: _______________
Telephone No.: ___ Printed Name: ___
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ANY OBJECTION TO THIS APPLICATION MUST BE FILED WITHIN 21 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF SERVICE NOTED BELOW. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEI hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Application were mailed, postage prepaid, this ___ day of ___, ___, to: ___, Trustee
United States Attorney's Office
555 4th Street, N.W. - 5th Floor
Washington, DC 20001
Office of United States Trustee
115 South Union Street
Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
_______________
Signature
_______________
Printed Name
Alert