- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
In re Resource Technology Corporation, Cast No. 99 B 35434
Eugene R. Wedoff
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ORDER AWARDING TO HINSIIAW & CULBERTSON LLP, SPECIAL COUNSEL TO THE ESTATE, FOR ALLOWANCE AND PAYMENT OF INTERIM COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSESTOTAL FEES REQUESTED: $11,985.00 TOTAL COSTS REQUESTED: $12.51 TOTAL FEES REDUCED: $552.50 TOTAL COSTS REDU CHD: $0.00 TOTALISES ALLOWED: $11,432.50 TOTAL COSTS ALLOWED: $12.51 TOTAL FEES AND COSTS ALLOWED; $11,445.01
THE COURT HAS MARKED THE ATTACHED TIME AND EXPENSE ENTRIES THAT HAVE BEEN DISALLOWED IN WHOLEOR IN PART, THE BASIS FOR EACH DISALLOWANCE IS DISCLOSED BY THE NUMERICAL NOTATION THAT APPEARS ON THELEFT SIDEOF EACH HIGHLIGHTED ENTRY THE NUMERICAL NOTATIONS REFER TO THE ENUMERATED PARAGRAPHS BELOW.
(1) Insufficient Description
The Court denies the allowance of compensation for the following task since the description of the time entry fails to identify in a reasonable manner the service rendered. In re Pettibone, 74 B.R. 293, 301 (Bankr. N.D. Ill 1987) ("A proper fee application must list each activity, its date, the attorney who performed the work, a description of the nature and substance of the work performed, and the time spent on the work, [Citation omitted] Records which give no explanation of the activities performed are not compensable."); In re Wildman, 72 B.R. 700, 708-9 (Rankr. N.D. Ill. 1987) (same).
Alert