Becerra v. Salazar

LINDA M. VANZI

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

Gabriel Becerra
Albuquerque, NM
Pro Se Appellant Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A.
Lisa C. Ortega
Seth L. Sparks
Albuquerque, NM
for Appellee

supplemented complaint is final for purposes of appeal. [MIO 2] This Court will not consider propositions that are unsupported by citation to authority. ITT Educ. Servs., Inc. v. Taxation & Revenue Dep't, 1998-NMCA-078, ¶ 10, 125 N.M. 244, 959 P.2d 969. We therefore reject this argument. {8} Accordingly, we hold that Appellant has not demonstrated that the district court's order denying his motion to amend the complaint is a final order which can be appealed at this stage of the proceedings. For these reasons, we dismiss this appeal. We note that, once the district court enters a final order in this case, Appellant is free to appeal in accordance with our rules of procedure. {9} IT IS SO ORDERED.