In re Autry

Disciplinary Review Board Maurice J. Gallipoli

Disciplinary Review Board
District Docket Nos. XIV-2016-0480E; XIV-2016-0432E; and XIV-2017-0231E Dissent

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of New Jersey.

I dissent from the majority and vote to recommend respondent's disbarment. I do so not because of respondent's disciplinary record, but because an attorney who fails to comply with an Order of the Court entered in attorney discipline or fee arbitration matters manifests a disdain for the disciplinary process and the responsibilities attendant to the privilege of being permitted to practice the profession of the law. If the Board were to recommend disbarment, respondent would be compelled to appear before the Court to explain why he or she has not complied with the Court's Order requiring the filing of the R. 1:20-20 affidavit. I believe that this should occur.

By such a procedure, I believe that the public and respondent's clients would be protected from the consequences of respondent's suspension and all attorneys would quickly come to understand and appreciate the importance of compliance with the Court's Orders and the grave potential consequences of non-compliance.

Disciplinary Review Board

Maurice J. Gallipoli

By:/s/_________

Ellen A. Brodsky

Chief Counsel